Thursday, February 18, 2016

FROM R DALY DEFACTO HUMILIATION!!!!! 28 AUG 2013

 
 
From: admin (lsc)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:08 AM
Subject: COM-2013-1100
 
Dear Mr Seidner

We acknowledge with thanks your email of 27 August.  We have requested for some information from the practitioner and will be in contact with you when we receive his response.

Thanks and regards

Russell Daily
Legal Services COMMISSIONER    n
Legal Services BOARD    n   Level 9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne 3000
T:  03 9679 8001 or 03 9679 8057
F:  03 9679 8101



From: g87 [mailto:g87@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 1:09 PM
To: admin (lsc)
Cc: Rabbi smukler; Ella Blesofski; Rabbi Telsner
Subject: REMINDER TO...... TO LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR


TO:
Russell Daily
Executive Director, Regulation & Complaints
Legal Services COMMISSIONER n
Legal Services BOARD n Level 9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000
': 03 9679 8001 7: 03 9679 8101 8: admin@lsc.vic.gov.au


Dear Russell Daily
I think it is about time that you sought an intelligent response. There has been too much cover – up and deliberate stalling.

Kindly ensure that you send me ALL  originals of yours – as well as Gadens letters to you.
I understand you have an original letter of yours sent by email to my person yet to be to be on forwarded to me.

Yours Sincerely
Geoff Seidner



From: g87
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 12:31 PM
Subject: TO LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR

TO:
Russell Daily
Executive Director, Regulation & Complaints
Legal Services COMMISSIONER n
Legal Services BOARD n Level 9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000
': 03 9679 8001 7: 03 9679 8101 8: admin@lsc.vic.gov.au


Dear Russell Daily

Thank you for your email of 7/8.

  • YOU ARE REQUESTED TO SEND ME HARD COPY IN POST OF YOUR YESTERDAY’S EMAIL AS WELL AS ALL FUTURE EMAILS TO BE THUS CONFIRMED.
  • Similarly your email of 26/7
Kindly advise Gadens to post me signed hard copies of originals of emails sent me: methinks there are only two or three.

Indeed – they studiously refused to ‘come clean’ – in plainly refusing to elucidate as to THAT **** document – instead forcing me to write to your office – see my  letter to ‘Carl’ – 9/7/13.
Note my comments below – which answers your questions – point by point.

1****
The document in question was dated sometime March 2012. It remained dormant / non – acted upon by Ella Blusofsky – until she happened to look through her files and identified that Zeimer / Gadens/  Walker codicyl??? which had sent it to the school – presumably sometime around March 2012. WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT – ZEIMER / WALKER HAVE NEVER DISOWNED IT –[they cannot!!!] AND HAVE PLAYED ASININE GAMES WITH ME IN / VIA MULTIPLE SNOW JOBS AS I DESIGNATED IT!!!
ELLA READ THE DOC. TO ME ON THE PHONE 24/6 WHEN I ENQUIRED ABOUT IT PRESUMABLY ON MONDAY JUNE 24 this year.

ELLA TOLD ME THAT THE DOC SAID THAT WE ARE NOT TO APPROACH OUR MEGA – GORGEOUS GRAND DAUGHTER  ON SCHOOL GROUNDS UNLESS IT WAS AN END OF YEAR SPEC OCCASION.
POOR ELLA APOLOGIZED – BUT SAID TO EVA AND 3 DAYS LATER TO ME THAT IT WAS A LEGAL DOC SIGNED BY WALKER.
It all related to a telephone conversation Ella made to my wife Eva – LATE IN THE AFTERNOON  on FRIDAY 21/6/13  nervously telling Eva that she cannot come to the school precincts – as part of the LEGAL DOCUMENT’s conditions she quoted from. My wife was too shocked for words – and being the sort of person she is – left it there. She failed to recall any such conditions!!

IT WAS TOO LATE FOR US  TO PHONE HER BACK – HAVING FOUND NO SUCH DOC!!!!!!!!

As I recall as written MANY TIMES – the document was a defacto extension of the IVO these people improperly issued against us a few short years ago. Plainly the act of creating said doc and passing it off as a facsimilie of the court – endorsed agreement was plainly fraudulent.

In attempting / seeking to keep it away from our eyes – see below and all other items – was a cover – up. The continuum – in repeating derivations of cover up of a lamentable fraud – has made it of Watergate  proportions! It is plainly incumbent on Jason Walker to explain – even if his client told him to act so – to have NOT acted so!!!

I ADVISE YOU THAT IMPORTANT PEOPLE FROM THE YESHIVAH BETH RIVKAH SCHOOL HAVE BEEN SENT COPIES OF THESE PAPERS SO NOT ONLY CAN YOU CONTACT THEM FOR CONFIRMATION OF THE VERACITY OF WHAT I WRITE _ BUT THESE PEOPLE CAN INDEED COMMUNICATE WITH YOU AU NATURAL IF THEY WISH TO DO SO.

Even if Zeimer and his appendant in – house legal advisers told Walker to do so – it is incumbent on Walker to have REFUSED TO DO SO  – simply because he is  a servant of the court – and it is HIS SIGNATURE ON THE DOC HE FRAUDULENTLY CREATED WITH OBVIOUS INDUBITABLE INPUT FROM ZEIMER AND APPENDANT / ACOLYTES / IN – HOUSE LEGAL ADVISERS!

IT IS INCUMBENT FOR HOWARD ZEIMER AND HIS APPENDANTS / ACOLYTES / IN - HOUSE LEGAL ADVISERS – TO ADVISE WHAT ROLE THEY HAD IN WHAT MAY HAVE SEEMED TO THEM AS A ‘GOOD IDEA AT THE TIME’!
THEY HAVE CREATED MANY FRAUDS – A FEW DETAILS HAVE BEEN EXTANT IN THESE CORRESPONDENCES! Now you appreciate why I have sent examplars of merely a few of them in these / earlier correspondences.

It is necessary for Howard Zeimer, his wife Shoshana Zeimer, appendants / acolytes / in – house legal advisers to realize that they have effectively been responsible for the humiliation and more of a basically good person in Jason Walker – and  belatedly apologize to us via a public forum – and to Jason Walker – who is left carrying the blame.

###########################################################################################################
#############################################################################################################

2
I now continue responding to your email didactically. ‘Supplementary conditions’ – answered above methinks.

3
Ditto. The initils etc have no importance – never an issue.

4
No issue or relevance.
I do address your comment about ‘’...added manually’’
Note that I was told that upon perusing my court files – only electronically – lodged files are shown. This may or may not be correct.
Since then I have drawn the conclusion that there are no documents extant on the file post FEB 2012. Therefore Walker did not even bother to complete the fraud by lodging this March 2012 entity MANUALLY.

Note again – it matters not whatever dichotomy is espoused – the March Doc WAS sent to the school as / with  defacto fraudulent intent – whether JW   conmsumated the fraud via non – electronic / ‘’’’supplementary conditions’’ or not!!

5
I do not see anything here to comment on – surely covered above – and seems irrelevant.

6
Nothing here.

7
See above if relevant and is disclosed in inquiry of yourself?

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
##################################################################################################################

As far as the remaining 2 paragraphs are concerned – not numbered – INDEED I AGREE WITH YOUR SECOND LAST PARAGRAPH: IT IS INDEED A CONTRAVENTION _ ? FRAUD BY THE ZEIMER  APPENDANT ? CLUIQUE!!!

As far as your last paragraph is concerned – it is indeed not for you to ‘’comment on court orders’’.

Nor for you to contemplate how your own inquiries will impact on anything – whether it be our being able to see our wonderful adorable grand daughter.

I make this comment: these papers plainly relate to Dina – the fraudulent chimera has been created to apply only to Dina.
And I say to you – our wonderful grandson Reuvi – who is having his Barmitzvah this Saturday – is no less wonderful.
Pathetically Howard Zeimer has not deemed us as part of Reuvi’s life – and we have not been invited to attend any of the celebrations!! THIS IS PATHETIC!!
I thought to add this because we intend to attend merely the Synagogue – as can anyone.

May these people belatedly realize that they do their children – our beloved grandchildren – no benefit as they even now try to eviscerate their loving grandparents.

AS MY DENOUEMENT TO YOU MR DAILY – note that it is not  for you comment on any action we may or may not take.

You should ensure that Howard Zeimer, his wife Shoshana Zeimer, his appendants / acolytes / in – house legal advisers – be sent complete copies of what you have seen in this lamentable, pathetic matter. Who knows – we may get an invitation to their celebratory party for our wonderful grandson’s Barmitvah!!!

AS YOU WILL INDEED TO JASON WALKER,

Yours Sincerely
Geoff Seidner




From: admin (lsc)
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:00 PM
Subject: COM-2013-1100 (RD)

Dear Mr Seidner

Please find attached letter.

Thank you

Kind Regards
Russell Daily
Executive Director, Regulation & Complaints
Legal Services COMMISSIONER n
Legal Services BOARD n Level 9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000
': 03 9679 8001 7: 03 9679 8101 8: admin@lsc.vic.gov.au
This email is confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the Legal Services Board on 9679 8000 and delete it from your computer. Details about our compliance with privacy laws can be found on our website at www.lsb.vic.gov.au
Think twice before printing



This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com

Click here to report this email as spam.

No comments:

Post a Comment