From: g87
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 12:17 PM
Subject: THIS FILE WAS MISSING FROM MAIIN BODY - dated 29/8
Dear Chief Justice
I send you this file that was inadvertently not enclosed......THIS FILE WAS
MISSING FROM MAIN BODY OF DOCS SENT YOU – THE ORIG WAS dated 29/8/13
Thank you
Geoff Seidner
From: g87
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:30 PM
To: admin (lsc)
Subject: DATED 29/8 to Legal Services COMMISSIONER
Russell
Daily
Legal
Services
COMMISSIONER n
Legal
Services BOARD
n Level 9, 330 Collins
Street Melbourne 3000
T: 03 9679
8001 or 03 9679 8057
F: 03 9679
8101
Dear Mr Daily
Thank you for your latest as below; I note that you ‘’requested for some information’’
from Gadens: I also note that there was from memory an earlier time that you
communicated with ‘’the practitioner.’’
I remind you of my email of 28/7 – item 4 – 7....see ‘the lot’ – 1
- 10 below.
Kindly note that there have been at least 2 occasions when
you have communicated with Gadens.
Further note that I had occasion earlier to complain about your handling of
the matters in front of you – indeed I addressed one of my emails to Michael
Garvie the Legal Services Commissioner on 26/7.
Subsequently I had to redirect you in a recent email – to ensure you
finally understood where the matter was.
Note that I requested – 28/7 a number of things: that I be sent copies of
your communications and that you ensure that Gadens / Jason Walker and his
clients / appendants be sent copies of all my correspondences.
I CITED TRANSPERANCY as justifying this – indeed as you note that I wanted
Gadens / Walker / Zeimer et al to be similarly advantaged.
I do not imply the usual when I advise in my over – generous way that I
want to show him mine – and he does not have to show me his [Gadens – Zeimer et
al] correspondences!
BUT YOUR COMMUNICATION WTH GADENS / WALKER DOES NOT ELICIT
ANY PRIVACY CONSIDERATIONS!
Indeed it is absolutely imperative that you immediately send me same.
I NEED TO BE CONFIDENT THAT THE MATTER IS BEING HANDLED CORRECTLY: AT THIS
STAGE MATTERS ARE BEING HIDDEN FROM ME!
SATISFY ME THAT NOTHING IS BEING HIDDEN FROM ME, PLEASE! By sending
me...... inc all orinals as / if relevant. I do not think you want The Ombudsman
being involved....
Full disclosure will elicit this – your appropriate actions - particularly
as someone in your office will have to assess how to indict Gadens for playing
sick, unprofessional games with us.
And it will be seemingly YOUR OFFICE’S ADJUDICATION - need to be / have to pass the test of
reasonableness.
Given that I am reasonably confident that you have nothing to hide
– you will not have any reason to not comply as above.
And you can send this email to Gadens ....
Yours Sincerely
Geoff Seidner
##########################################################################
ex 28/7
Denouement to Legal Services Commissioner
Dear unknown person,
My wife and I will be leaving finally on Monday morning and I advise you as
follows.
- Given earlier failure of Mr Daily to reach an even basic understanding of what the subject matter was / is / remains, any reasonable reader will readily appreciate that I fail to enthuse about his earlier comment that someone unspecified wrote / described my complaint and sought a response – without any / even basic terms ensconced therein.
- I have no idea as to wheteher anything has changed: the below does not fill me with confidence.
- It is not good enough for me that somewhere resident of an unspecified person’s mind of someone at the Legal Services Commissioner – is the idea that [given past failure!] is the idea that they have done their job!
- Not good enough! I respectfully require that your said unspecified person be transparent and send me [hard etc] copies via email of his correspondences with me and with Gadens / Jason Walker!
- INCLUDING ORIGINALS BY POST. Indeed – emasils are OK.
- It is required that all previous and incipient correspondences be sent to me as above.
- You may also consider that all my correspondences also be sent to Gadens / Jason Walker. This may prove to be important simply because Howard Zeimer and Gadens etc should be made aware of ALL matters material. This transparency is the very basis of the legal system.
- It is understood that Howard Zeimer et al will wish to have complete knowledge of all matters. THAT IS HIS RIGHT – AND BECAUSE HE MAY HAVE QUESTIONS HE ET AL MAY NEED TO ANSWER – IT IS A BASIC PRINCIPAL OF COMMON LAW THAT HE SHOULD HAVE INSIGHT AS TO HOW JW / GADENS WRITE SOTO ZEIMER AND HIS APPENDANTS.
- To wit – I care not who is responsible – so long as all parties are made aware of all matters. And their subsequent response is based on complete knowledge
- Indeed – I am seriously thinking of sending copies to Gadens myself if you do not satisfy me of having satisfactorily handled this matter.
Yours Sincerely
Geoff seidner
Dear Mr Seidner
Thank you for your responses.
We have contacted Mr Walker to seek a response to your complaint.
He is currently away. At this stage we do not need anything further from you.
Hopefully we will hear from Mr Walker within a reasonable period of time, but if
we have not heard from him within 2 weeks we will contact you
again.
Thank you
Kind Regards
Administration
Dear Mr
Seidner
We acknowledge with thanks your
email of 27 August. We have requested for some information from the
practitioner and will be in contact with you when we receive his
response.
Thanks and
regards
Russell
Daily
Legal
Services
COMMISSIONER
n
Legal
Services
BOARD
n
Level
9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne 3000
T:
03
9679 8001 or 03 9679 8057
F:
03
9679 8101
From:
g87 [mailto:g87@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 1:09 PM
To: admin (lsc)
Cc: Rabbi smukler; Ella Blesofski; Rabbi Telsner
Subject: REMINDER TO...... TO LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR
Sent: Friday, 23 August 2013 1:09 PM
To: admin (lsc)
Cc: Rabbi smukler; Ella Blesofski; Rabbi Telsner
Subject: REMINDER TO...... TO LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR
TO:
Russell
Daily
Executive
Director, Regulation & Complaints
Legal
Services COMMISSIONER n
Legal
Services BOARD n
Level
9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000
Dear Russell
Daily
I think it is
about time that you sought an intelligent response. There has been too much
cover – up and deliberate stalling.
Kindly ensure
that you send me ALL originals of yours – as well as Gadens letters to
you.
I understand
you have an original letter of yours sent by email to my person yet to be to be
on forwarded to me.
Yours
Sincerely
Geoff
Seidner
From:
g87
Sent:
Thursday, August 08, 2013 12:31 PM
To:
admin (lsc)
Cc:
Rabbi smukler ; Ella Blesofski ; Rabbi Telsner
Subject:
TO LEGAL SERVICES DIRECTOR
TO:
Russell
Daily
Executive
Director, Regulation & Complaints
Legal
Services COMMISSIONER n
Legal
Services BOARD n
Level
9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000
Dear
Russell Daily
Thank you
for your email of 7/8.
- YOU
ARE REQUESTED TO SEND ME HARD COPY IN POST OF YOUR YESTERDAY’S EMAIL AS WELL AS
ALL FUTURE EMAILS TO BE THUS CONFIRMED.
- Similarly
your email of 26/7
Kindly
advise Gadens to post me signed hard copies of originals of emails sent me:
methinks there are only two or three.
Indeed –
they studiously refused to ‘come clean’ – in plainly refusing to elucidate as to
THAT **** document – instead forcing me to write to your office – see my letter
to ‘Carl’ – 9/7/13.
Note my
comments below – which answers your questions – point by point.
1****
The
document in question was dated sometime March 2012.
It remained dormant / non – acted upon by Ella Blusofsky – until she happened to
look through her files and identified that Zeimer / Gadens/ Walker codicyl???
which had sent it to the school – presumably sometime around March 2012.
WE HAVE NEVER SEEN
IT – ZEIMER / WALKER HAVE NEVER DISOWNED IT –[they cannot!!!]
AND HAVE PLAYED ASININE GAMES WITH ME IN / VIA MULTIPLE SNOW JOBS AS I
DESIGNATED IT!!!
ELLA READ
THE DOC. TO ME ON THE PHONE 24/6 WHEN I ENQUIRED ABOUT IT PRESUMABLY ON MONDAY
JUNE 24 this
year.
ELLA TOLD
ME THAT THE DOC SAID THAT WE ARE NOT TO APPROACH OUR MEGA – GORGEOUS GRAND
DAUGHTER ON SCHOOL GROUNDS UNLESS IT WAS AN END OF YEAR SPEC
OCCASION.
POOR ELLA
APOLOGIZED – BUT SAID TO EVA AND 3 DAYS LATER TO ME THAT IT WAS A LEGAL DOC
SIGNED BY WALKER.
It all
related to a telephone conversation Ella made to my wife Eva – LATE IN THE AFTERNOON on FRIDAY
21/6/13 nervously telling Eva that she cannot come to the
school precincts – as part of the LEGAL DOCUMENT’s conditions she quoted from.
My wife was too shocked for words – and being the sort of person she is – left
it there. She failed to recall any such conditions!!
IT WAS TOO
LATE FOR US TO PHONE HER BACK – HAVING FOUND NO SUCH DOC!!!!!!!!
As I recall
as written MANY TIMES – the document was a defacto extension of the
IVO these people improperly issued against us a few short years ago. Plainly the
act of creating said doc and passing it off as a facsimilie of the court –
endorsed agreement was plainly fraudulent.
In
attempting / seeking to keep it away from our eyes – see below and all other
items – was a cover – up. The continuum – in repeating derivations of cover up
of a lamentable fraud – has made it of Watergate proportions! It is plainly
incumbent on Jason Walker to explain – even if his client told him to act so –
to have NOT acted so!!!
I
ADVISE YOU THAT IMPORTANT PEOPLE FROM THE YESHIVAH BETH RIVKAH SCHOOL HAVE BEEN
SENT COPIES OF THESE PAPERS SO NOT ONLY CAN YOU CONTACT THEM FOR CONFIRMATION OF
THE VERACITY OF WHAT I WRITE _ BUT THESE PEOPLE CAN INDEED COMMUNICATE WITH YOU
AU
NATURAL
IF THEY WISH TO DO SO.
Even if
Zeimer and his appendant in – house legal advisers told Walker to do so – it is
incumbent on Walker to have REFUSED TO DO SO – simply because he is a servant
of the court – and it is HIS SIGNATURE ON THE
DOC HE FRAUDULENTLY CREATED WITH OBVIOUS INDUBITABLE INPUT FROM ZEIMER AND
APPENDANT / ACOLYTES / IN – HOUSE LEGAL ADVISERS!
IT IS
INCUMBENT FOR HOWARD ZEIMER AND HIS APPENDANTS / ACOLYTES / IN - HOUSE LEGAL
ADVISERS – TO ADVISE WHAT ROLE THEY HAD IN WHAT MAY HAVE SEEMED TO THEM AS A
‘GOOD IDEA AT THE TIME’!
THEY HAVE
CREATED MANY FRAUDS – A FEW DETAILS HAVE BEEN EXTANT IN THESE CORRESPONDENCES!
Now you appreciate why
I have sent examplars of merely a few of them in these / earlier
correspondences.
It is
necessary for Howard Zeimer, his wife Shoshana Zeimer, appendants / acolytes /
in – house legal advisers to realize that they have effectively been responsible
for the humiliation and more of a basically good person in Jason Walker – and
belatedly apologize to
us via a public forum – and to Jason Walker – who is left
carrying the blame.
###########################################################################################################
#############################################################################################################
2
I now
continue responding to your email didactically. ‘Supplementary conditions’ –
answered above methinks.
3
Ditto. The
initils etc have no importance – never an issue.
4
No issue or
relevance.
I do
address your comment about ‘’...added manually’’
Note that I
was told that upon perusing my court files – only electronically – lodged files
are shown. This may or may not be correct.
Since then
I have drawn the conclusion that there are no documents extant on the file post
FEB 2012. Therefore Walker did not even bother to complete the fraud by lodging
this March 2012 entity MANUALLY.
Note again
– it matters not whatever dichotomy is espoused – the March Doc WAS sent to the
school as / with defacto fraudulent intent – whether JW conmsumated the fraud
via non – electronic / ‘’’’supplementary conditions’’ or not!!
5
I do not
see anything here to comment on – surely covered above – and seems
irrelevant.
6
Nothing
here.
7
See
above if relevant and is disclosed in inquiry of yourself?
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
##################################################################################################################
##################################################################################################################
As
far as the remaining 2 paragraphs are concerned – not numbered – INDEED I AGREE
WITH YOUR SECOND LAST PARAGRAPH: IT IS INDEED A CONTRAVENTION _ ? FRAUD BY THE
ZEIMER APPENDANT ? CLUIQUE!!!
As
far as your last paragraph is concerned – it is indeed not for you to ‘’comment
on court orders’’.
Nor
for you to contemplate how your own inquiries will impact on anything – whether
it be our being able to see our wonderful adorable grand
daughter.
I
make this comment: these papers plainly relate to Dina – the fraudulent chimera
has been created to apply only to Dina.
And
I say to you – our wonderful grandson Reuvi – who is having his Barmitzvah this
Saturday – is no less wonderful.
Pathetically
Howard Zeimer has not deemed us as part of Reuvi’s life – and we have not been
invited to attend any of the celebrations!! THIS IS
PATHETIC!!
I
thought to add this because we intend to attend merely the Synagogue – as can
anyone.
May
these people belatedly realize that they do their children – our beloved
grandchildren – no benefit as they even now try to eviscerate their loving
grandparents.
AS
MY DENOUEMENT TO YOU MR DAILY – note that it is not for you comment on any
action we may or may not take.
You
should ensure that Howard Zeimer, his wife Shoshana Zeimer, his appendants /
acolytes / in – house legal advisers – be sent complete copies of what you have
seen in this lamentable, pathetic matter. Who knows – we may get an invitation
to their celebratory party for our wonderful grandson’s
Barmitvah!!!
AS
YOU WILL INDEED TO JASON WALKER,
Yours
Sincerely
Geoff
Seidner
Dear Mr Seidner
Please find attached letter.
Thank you
Kind Regards
Russell
Daily
Executive
Director, Regulation & Complaints
Legal
Services
COMMISSIONER
n
Legal
Services
BOARD
n
Level
9, 330 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000
This
email is confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify
the Legal Services Board on 9679 8000 and delete it from your computer. Details
about our compliance with privacy laws can be found on our website at www.lsb.vic.gov.au
Think
twice before printing
This
message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com
Click
here
to report this email as
spam.
No comments:
Post a Comment